since 2005: blogging about law & politics

  • Majority Rule or Rule of Law? Neutrality, Constitutional Supremacy and the Perils of Majoritarian Logic

    Majority Rule or Rule of Law? Neutrality, Constitutional Supremacy and the Perils of Majoritarian Logic

    Having the numbers in Parliament does not make something lawful. When constitutional neutrality is treated as just another political choice, we blur the line between majority rule and the rule of law. Neutrality is not a mood or a tactic. It is a constitutional commitment that cannot shift with the parliamentary winds. That is the…

  • Judicial independence in the EU: structural pressures beyond formal Rule of Law monitoring

    Judicial independence in the EU: structural pressures beyond formal Rule of Law monitoring

    Questions about judicial independence within the EU are rising, with Malta, Spain, and Italy exemplifying systemic pressures affecting national judiciaries. Incremental reforms and political contestation challenge autonomy despite formal structures. The EU’s legal responses may lag behind emerging risks, highlighting the need for robust institutional practices and public trust to ensure effective judicial independence. Across…

  • Judicial Appointments: The System is Broken

    Judicial Appointments: The System is Broken

    This is not only a clash between a judge and a Prime Minister. It is a warning that Malta’s system for appointing its Chief Justice is structurally broken. We like to believe the two-thirds parliamentary rule protects the courts from political capture. In theory it forces consensus. In reality it often just forces negotiation. Instead…

  • Democracy Is Not a Legal Alibi: Why Constitutional Supremacy Cannot Be Voted Away

    Democracy Is Not a Legal Alibi: Why Constitutional Supremacy Cannot Be Voted Away

    Robert Musumeci argues that Malta’s Constitution prioritizes democratic procedures over judicial authority. However, this analysis overlooks the importance of constitutional supremacy and judicial independence, which serve as essential checks within a democracy. Constitutional amendments must not undermine the foundational principles protecting rights and governance, highlighting the relationship between legality and democracy.

  • From the Cold War to the ICE Age: The US Abdication from the Free World

    From the Cold War to the ICE Age: The US Abdication from the Free World

    From Iraq to Kabul and from foreign battlefields to American streets the United States has drifted from law to force. This post traces how post Cold War hubris 9/11 trauma and Trump era doctrines have hollowed out the rule based order leaving the free world leaderless and at risk. Three and a half decades after…

  • Alarm Bells in Caracas – a wake up call for the EU

    Alarm Bells in Caracas – a wake up call for the EU

    Trump’s reckless invasion of Venezuela shatters illusions about a self-sustaining rules-based order. The EU now faces a decisive choice: drift into irrelevance or unite, wielding both muscle and diplomacy, to defend postwar values of human rights, justice and law. History demands leadership; hesitation means surrender by instalments for Europe itself. There are moments when history…

servis legis summus ut liberi esse possimus

This website stores cookies on your computer. These cookies are used to provide a more personalized experience and to track your whereabouts around our website in compliance with the European General Data Protection Regulation. If you decide to to opt-out of any future tracking, a cookie will be setup in your browser to remember this choice for one year.

Accept or Deny