Categories
Uncategorized

Thyme's Up

Where j’accuse deals with the recent discussions on the appointment of John Dalli, with the anger of Joe Borg, with the EU gravy train and with the meaning of working for the EU.

Yesterday evening I was invited to a special ceremony celebrating our cabinet secretary’s 20 years of service at the Court of Justice of the European Union (get used to that name : it’s the new Lisbon Treaty version as of today).  Around a score or more employees of this venerable institution were being feted with commemorative medallions for having spent 20, 25, 30, 35 or two score (yes there was one) years working for the Curia Europea. It was a short and sweet ceremony involving the usual doses of champagne (Massard), wine (Latour) and as far as I was concerned ubersugared orange juice. It was nice to see a warm side of the institution as gave thanks for years of faithful service.

The recent appointment of the man formerly known as Johnny Cash as Malta’s brand new Commissioner and the abrasive brushing aside of former Commissioner Joe Borg has set the usual tongues rolling as to the “gravy train” and that plebeian sort of language spiked with envy, infused with communist hopeless egalitarianism and boiling over with an “I-don’t-know-what-the-fuck-I’m-on-about je ne sais quoi”.

Speculation as to whether Dalli was kicked upstairs and whether Joe Borg was dumped like a used condom on campus was fair game I would say. That it would be peppered with the nauseating mantra of “European employees in it for the money” talk should have been avoidable but then again considering the education and source of most of the interlocutors it could not have been otherwise.

Anybody who has worked away at any of the institutions wil by now be used to the whole chat of “we put you there” to the “we pay taxes for you” kind of claptrap. I for one heard this kind of bullshit long before we even voted to be in or out. I distinctly remember course mates of mine (who later wiggled their way to the seats of administrative power in MLPN) first mocking me for opting for an EU Law postgrad then wondering loudly whether “friends of friends” meant that I would get my job at an EU gravy trough. They were oblivious to the blatant inconsistencies of their argument (and possibly ignorant of the fact that I never would, and never will, need friends of friends to get anywhere).

Like myself there are hundreds of others who are now earning an honest living with the EU institutions and do so thanks to having sat for examinations or interviews where they were judged on their merits and not on their networks. Of course there will always be political appointees – starting from the MEP’s elected by the people to the Commissioner selected by the government. In the case of the Commissioner one would hope that the government makes its choice on the basis of political and technical know-how and not simply to award another job for a high class boy or to exile an uncomfortable insider to Brussels.

Some people just do not get that though. To them even the appointment to a prestigious post such as EU Commissioner is all about the gravy train – at least when it pays the critics to think that way. Here’s Daphne kicking off the Joe Borg Damage Limitation Exercise. It’s a staple PN response by now – usa e getta (use and discard) with head on personality attack:

Someone should remind Joe Borg that he’s been at the EU trough for five years and that it looks – well, slightly grasping – to make such a fuss about being wrenched away from his salary. Funny how he didn’t mention the money in his interview, like that isn’t a major factor. It’s just so painful to watch.

It’s blatant, in-your-face cejca talk. It’s as though Gonzi has a queue of old guard members standing around waiting for their turn to suck at the EU’s bounteous nipple. Then again it might be a matter of class. You know how the PN machine has been going on about razza and radika and all:

The point is that there was NO MESSAGE to communicate. Joe Borg was appointed to serve a fixed term from 2004 to 2009. When that term is up, it’s up. He was the only one assuming anything and – worse – taking it for granted. Even if he thinks the prime minister was an inconsiderate ass for not telling him ahead of time, there is absolutely no justification for the gross ill manners and poor judgement of giving an interview like that. What can I say without sounding like a terrible snob? Breeding will out. The sense of entitlement these people have is horrendous. – Daphne again (who else?)

The point is that confirmation or otherwise is not about whose turn it is to suck at the EU nipple. It is about who best represents the Maltese governments’ interest. In that case Borg might have been entitled to have some hope in the fact that Commission President Barroso would have liked to have him reconfirmed. No harm in that (and no class faux pas either).

On the other hand PM Gonzi is fully entitled to use this appointment to “kick Dalli upstairs” and get the Qormi Confessor as far from his troublesome backbenchers as possible. When he does that – and how he does that is open to fair comment and says many things about the state of affairs at Triq Herbert Ganado. For the PN spin machine to change this to crude money grabbing arguments of the Brussels Gravy Train variety (normally the killing fields for Eurosceptics) is not just cheap but plain ignorant.

That the PN spin machine has no qualms about denigrating important appointments and the value of working for EU institutions beyond earning that extra cash and pay out says much about how far from the 1987 PN it has come. No wonder we might still have to peg our noses when it comes to voting the next government because this one’s thyme (sic) is up.

Quotes from the blog Running Commentary are taken from comments to the post entitled “Maltese radicals – an oxymoron

As for the gravyt train in popular perception do check out the Malta Today editorial cartoon here.

Facebook Comments Box

19 replies on “Thyme's Up”

If I’m not mistaken Joe Borg said that the Prime Minister had indicated that he might still be in the running for a second term…..that’s one of the reasons he might have felt (understandably) put out, that the Prime Minister didn’t bother to tell him how things stood.

It is now very clear that loads of nose pegs are going to be needed come next election because the Nationalist Party echelons need to be thought a lesson in humility. It seems that the European Parliament election result was not enough. Frankly I have had enough of the PN spin machine after going to vote for them reluctantly (but with no choice) in the last two elections.

While it is the Prime Minister’s prerogative to choose who to appoint, it is also basic manners to inform someone he will not be reappointed to a post particularly when you have someone like President Barroso canvassing for a reappointment.

Commissioner Borg said he was led to believe that he was being seriously considered for reappointment. Therefore not being informed by the Prime Minister is either a case of huge arrogance or else confirmation that does not have the courage to face people with tough decisions.

This one’s thyme is up and by the latest tactics he gotta smell that cumin.

Sadly, it’s gonna turn out to be another case of no alternatives. Wait and see what the machine will spin.

It is about who best represents the Maltese governments’ interest.

Jacques, please stop this. You know full well the only people with a brief to represent anything Maltese sit in the Council and EP.

Hemm irridek Faust. Agreed. The commissioners should serve the commission and perform their duties accordingly as guardians of the Treaty. Which makes you wonder what plausible reason ahead of government would have to ignore the Commission presidents’ suggestion to confirm the incumbent and go ahead appointing an uncomfortable (for the government) Minister instead.

Wow! That was a quick volte face!

What makes me wonder is *your* wonder. I seem to understand that to you it’s the failure to re-nominate Borg rather than the nomination of Dalli that’s the issue.

But what are you saying then? That Joe Borg is the only nominee the Maltese Government could have come up with who fits the bill?

Faust, for me the issue is not who the Commissioner is, frankly I don’t give a hoot. It is the Prime Minister’s beating around the bush and failing to be direct with someone who deserved better treatment. It is not about the nomination, it is about the way it was done.

So you opted to work in whatever EU institution you serve in for purely altruistic reasons and not for :
(a) The lolly;
(b) It looks better on your CV;
(c) (a) plus (b)

Charles, does it not occur to you that working for the institutions might also be interesting and exciting in terms of (i) working with people of above-average intellect, (ii) working with people with a sense of adventure who are willing to immerse themselves in a multicultural and multilingual environment, (iii) the actual content of the work? And then there’s the possibility of escaping narrow-minded, bigoted, invidious Malta (at the cost of leaving fun and family of course).

Another J

I might concede point (iii).

What makes you think that people working with EU institutions are of above-average intellect (meaning, I suppose, that the rest of us who beaver away at our jobs at home are intellectually inferior) .

Adventurous – Multicultural – Multilingual ? I hope I’m not so conceited as to think so about myself – but maybe, just maybe, being adventurous is leaving home at 18, studying and working abroad, alone, with no subsidies and with no support from anyone. In 1962.

Claire Bonello

Don’t be stupid. No I don’t work for free. Neither do I expect others to faint with admiration at what I do, especially since taxpayers don’t contribute a single cent to my pay.

JRZ
I might stay with you part of the way with Gandhi.

Mother Theresa? Philanthropist? JFC.

Funny now that we mention contributions. Taxpayers contribute 1€ a year to the overall EU salaries.

Even if we were to descend to the level of discussing work for dosh I think more euros go into state subsidies for such things as medicine, energy and more per head than that euro you pay Charlie. If you honestly think in the little box that you are not in any way obligated towards taxpayers even if you live in a vacuum then long live Mother Theresa.

If I wanted you to faint with admiration I’d put a plastic bag over your head. Granted does not do much for the admiration but works wonders for the fainting bit.

@ (ghax hekk moda) Charles Cauchi:

‘I might concede point (iii).’
Thank you.

‘What makes you think that people working with EU institutions are of above-average intellect’
They sit for competitive exams, and those who actually pass then compete for lucrative jobs…the ‘gravy train’ serves at least one purpose. And I know loads of people who work for the institutions – ‘above-average intellect’ is an understatement for many of them.

‘(meaning, I suppose, that the rest of us who beaver away at our jobs at home are intellectually inferior) .’
Not at all, I do not work for the institutions and am by far superior to most people in all but modesty.

‘Adventurous – Multicultural – Multilingual ? I hope I’m not so conceited as to think so about myself – but maybe, just maybe, being adventurous is leaving home at 18, studying and working abroad, alone, with no subsidies and with no support from anyone. In 1962.’
Well done you! I never said that you were not any of those things, but I expect that colleagues in Malta who fit that description are less common than those who fit the description in Jacques’ workplace.

I’m glad taxpayers don’t contribute a single cent to your pay, Charles. With a work ethic like yours, I’m surprised you actually have a job in the first place. I’m sure “I’m doing it for the lolly and the cv” went down great at the interview.

But let me guess, besides being adventurous, multilingual, and multicultural, you’re also a great actor. Or just self-employed.

Comments are closed.