Italy’s sovereign debt rating has been revised downwards (A from A+) by Standard and Poor’s. The marginal comment to this revision was that the country’s outlook was “negative”. Notwithstanding Berlusconi’s “manovra” that seemed to have appeased worries in the institutional corridors of Brussels, the credit rating agency “cited fears over Italy’s ability to cut state spending and bring its finances in order, particularly given the country’s growth prospects.” (BBC)
The Italian government’s reaction to this revision is once again redolent of the double-vision that is evident in every major capital in Europe these days. On the one hand there is the inevitable reality that is a euroland crisis that is crying for a common solution (common because of the interdependence of the euroland states) while on the other hand there is the survival instinct of the parties in government eager to avoid losing valuable election points in the national microcosm.
Malta’s Labour has been lashing at Gonzi & Co. for what they claim is the “ostrich” mentality that has overcome Pietà and Castille. The tune from Labour and other critics of government is that the Government has “conveniently ignored” Moody’s recent downgrading. For its part, barring the bravado of mavericks like Austin Gatt, the party in government seems to be content with the government by default line that has worked so well in recent years. While it is true that Labour is far from offering a practical alternative to the current men at the driving seat, it is also blatantly evident that the government by default lacks a coherent, value-driven and globally conscious plan. Surely a tough nut to crack for voters.
Back to Berlusconi and his government. The first reaction to the S&P revision was a tirade on the fourth estate. His government and its manoeuvres was not to blame – instead it was the bad feeling and lack of confidence generated by the papers. Pity that the stock exchanges in Milan and elsewhere seemed to be more on the wavelength of S&P and the papers than on Berlusconi’s side. Here is part of Palazzo Chigi’s official reaction (from La Stampa):
«Il governo ha sempre ottenuto la fiducia dal Parlamento, dimostrando così la solidità della propria maggioranza. Le valutazioni di Standard & Poor’s sembrano dettate più dai retroscena dei quotidiani che dalla realtà delle cose e appaiono viziate da considerazioni politiche»
The question is whose reality (realtà) is the real one and whose is the virtual?
The truth is out there.
2 replies on “Press Standards & Poor Berlusconi”
enjoyed the piece. Main difference…Malta Government says (in a nutshell) that it is down to Malta being part of the Union and the downgrade is not a reflection on its policies which it intends to stick to…as the fourth estate is conspicuous by its absence…while the Italian and International media is able to carry its energy into the issue where all aspects are challenged and the downgrade is depicted as it is…a sign of things that need changing or doing
One possible Malta example…Government points at GDP growth but does not tell us the extent to which that growth cascades into other economies…this may be the result of the privatisation process where the Private Maltese component was way below it should have been…hence the negativity felt at ground zero…that GDP performance is certainly not cascading down to ‘il-poplu’… now this is not to critise etc but to realise if the observation makes sense and how we may need to adjust strategies…one thing is for sure, In my opinion, Government’s organisations that attract foreign investment are mostly (putting it mildly) shambolic…
So this may explain severe frustrations at Government’s is buisness as usual stance. Perhaps it is happy that its organisation to win the next election is in ship shape condition…news? my goodness, one small point, why is the Black Dust report being made public now when it was completed in March? Is there any link to whatever process is underway with the new power station, tehrefore making use of the blck-dust report to add pressure on the process to ensure that the dellimara works find a ‘clean’ passage irrespective of anything there? Just my instinct there and may be totally wrong…but has the media looked into these things?
It’s amazing how some sectors of the media are gloating over Italy’s downgrade. It’s almost as if they’re happy about it. I wonder why…..
By the way, I’d be honoured if you have a look at my blog, tell me what you think about it, if you don’t mind ;) I’m new to blogging, and you’re a guru!
http://garnaw.wordpress.com/
Thanks mate!