The judgement in the case of the two paedophiles Godwin Scerri and Charles Pulis has justifiably leapt to the top of the most talked about news stories on the ether. There is no doubt that any normal human (anybody who does not have a Breivik streak anyway) will have passed through a mixture of emotions when hearing about how these two beings (they do not deserve to be called men) abused of the position of trust and responsibility with which society had entrusted them. Indignation, disgust, anger, sadness (for the victims) and the strong primitive desire to punish that hides the even more primitive need for revenge and retribution surely played a part in all of this.
While there is no doubt that Godwin and Charles deserve society’s strongest of reprimands and punishments that should be meted out in proportion to their heinous crime, it is also true that society – particularly the “instant liberals” need to put a damper or two on their enthusiastic attempts to throw everybody and everyone in the same basket. Sure Godwin and Charles operated under the guise of (and abused the name of) priests. Does that justify the sudden lynch mob directed towards priesthood in general? Is the institution so base as to suddenly equate it with “assassins” or “necrophiliacs”?
Let me state this differently. Our criminal law contains an aggravation (a factor that means that the crime committed will be punished more harshly) in the case of a policeman committing any crime. If a policeman steals something for example, his punishment is aggravated because he is committing a crime that he was duty bound to prevent. The crime is the same (theft) but the penalty is harsher (aggravated) because of the person who committed it. For a very logical and sound reason (that most people can get to without outside assistance) there is nothing written in the Criminal Code about punishing the whole police force whenever a policeman commits a crime.
Now “the Church” (and not only the MSSP) is a vast institution and I never tire of reminding people that it has an important social role to play within the fabric of many societies let alone ours where it has been a mainstay of society for at least a thousand years. We may suddenly have a lynch mob that has emitted the verdict of GUILTY on all priests and all MSSP members in particular but they conveniently tend to forget that the operation of orphanages in this country of ours (not to mention other social support structures) is entirely dependent on the Church. It is a service that goes on every day unnoticed (and mostly untrumpeted) in much the same way as your postal service works daily away from the limelight.
There can be no doubt that Malta’s Church requires a period of reflection and introspection : it has to ask itself which parts have gone wrong and why. It is not just the rotten apples that need seeing to but much more. From a lay point of view, the Concordat with the Maltese State has done the Church (and Malta) more harm than good and would best be disposed of as soon as possible. But this is not the time to stone the Church to death. The rotten part of the Church must go. For the sake of the Church and for the sake of our society that still depends on many of its valuable services.
Unleashing the lynch mob of “anti-papists”, “anti-clericals” and “liberal extremists” who won’t rest until they have the metaphorical blood of the Church on their hands will lead us to nowhere. Believers and non-believers might find that they have the same duty and social responsibility to help the Church redirect itself and its flock to living in a more tolerant world where abuse of trust does not happen so easily.
Hopefully it will not happen at all.
9 replies on “A nation of stone-throwers”
There is a marked difference between a paedophile and a necrophiliac. The latter’s victim doesn’t mind. It’s at times like these I wish god existed, because these men and all others like them would not get off lightly if he/she did exist.
of course there is a difference… but it wasn’t the point was it?
Twas not, that much is true.
Jacques,
I agree. I believe the problem is that the Maltese generally lack the capacity to distinguish between different situations.
Unfortunately, we only generalise. No grey areas, only black or white. The end result becomes an inevitable mish mash of conclusions.
Furthermore, we cannot look and analyse things objectively. We tend to use only our subjective perspective to look at things. Hence no clinical approach is possible.
I would say this problem of generalisation is not an exclusive Maltese one. You see it all the time away from our shores. I think it’s more a case of the power of the populist media. Let’s face it, most media here is akin to the English tabloids and they create sensations for sensationalism sake.
Having said that, it’s only natural that such a case will shock the nation, myself included.
The level of the uproar is justified by the high pedestal that the Church has always placed itself on.
I am a SPMC old boy and I regard the society very highly, but this case is giving me a very contrasting view. But then all ideas, life itself is full of contrasts.
I do not thing that the sexual abuse issue is exclusively a maltese or a church one. What we may perhaps need is to have an open discussion on the importance of a healthy sex life and the key values that our society applies and the values that may serve society better…I find that our society is still riddled with old wife’s tales that renders a main-stream sex life, within the context of a holistic life experience, nebulous and frustrating. Within this context, the crimes being discussed can be put within a wider picture that includes the celibacy issue etc…ok so the crimes under scrutiny may have nothing to do with the celibacy issue… but i have my doubts…an environment (eg a long prison sentence) can change the behavior patterns of a heterosexual…hopefully experts in the field can shed further light on values that should guide society towards healthy sex practices…
maybe and only remotely maybe – this makes some sense:
http://andrewazzopardi.wordpress.com/2011/08/03/gianella-u-l-bews/
You are right. We should not just link all priesthood to the abusers and assume that if one or two priests (or more) are abusers, therefore all are.
However, recent information is showing that the Church’s responsability is greater than they tried to make us believe.
http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20110805/local/Convicted-priest-was-absolved-in-2003.378874
Young man who lived in the same institute speaks…
http://andrewazzopardi.wordpress.com/2011/08/05/il-marfa-il-fathers-u-l-istampa-kollha/