Categories
Campaign 2013

Vote AD, get AD.

So it begins. It was inevitable that the moment the PN would start to see a tiny sliver of hope it would turn on alternattiva voters like there’s no tomorrow. It has happened before and it will go on happening with the timing of a swiss clock (did I say both swiss and clock in one phrase?) so long as the current rules of the game apply. Potential AD voters are targeted and accused of being irresponsible or of not knowing how to work out the math because it is obvious that if AD did not exist they would be voting anything but the dangerous, dangerous labour. But that is not the point is it? Here is what you should be thinking.

PLPN don’t own your vote

It’s the whole point of a campaign. At the start of a campaign it is assumed that no party has a guaranteed vote. It is supposed to earn them  with its proposals and plans. It is supposed to convince you. So to begin with your vote is not owned by anyone. If you chose to vote AD then no other party “loses” votes since it did not have them in the first place. Only arrogant parties who believe that the world is divided between partisan hotheads and “switchers” (the new floaters) believe that votes are “lost”. Voting AD means sending out a number of messages. It means that you have seen what the party has to offer and that you believe that you are best represented in parliament by that party.

It’s not about governance stupid

Oh. They will tell you that one of the two main parties needs a clear majority to be able to govern with stability. You are irresponsible if you let AD get in the way of the stability. But what does stability mean currently? It means that the PLPN can “govern” for five years and steamroller over the minority. Remember we had a relative majority government – 49% of the people for the last five years. That government failed to change the laws relating to electoral representation notwithstanding the fact that it had used and abused the flaws of representation last time round. Yes, five years back we had the same issues – party flag waving opinion columnists accused ad voters of setting themselves up as objects of hate right before voting in the stable government of JPO (number one in Bidnija), Franco Debono and Jesmond Mugliett. We were told then (remember Dudu?) that we should give priority to keeping Sant out then the PN would magically reform the electoral nonsense and give the world a fairer system. Ha!

Five years on

Voting AD is a statement. A positive one. It has nothing to do with tribal politics and everything to do with it. Right now AD carries the sole responsibility of being the third alternative. Ideally you would be voting AD because you found their proposals convincing. Another reason would be your refusal to be an accomplice to the PLPN hegemony – and that is becoming an important reason too. This campaign has shown us more than ever the true colours of the PLPN. Both parties are deeply indebted to wider circles of power prominent among which are the business community. They are parties that can shrug off a quarter of a million load as though it was everyday business, they deal in bartering and they seem to be inexplicably able to fund multi-millionaire campaigns.

You might have an inbuilt sympathy for one of the two parties that might come from an upbringing within a partisan milieu – the kind that the Labour Courage video tried to tap – but that does not make you a nationalist or labourite. It might help you find it easier not to vote for one of the parties and a little less easier not to vote for another. It’s a bad habit though nothing more. Remember nobody owns your vote. Your vote needs to be deserved. It cannot be won over on the eve of an election with the usual fear-mongering.

You reflected. You saw the rot that the PLPN have given us and the rot they are promising to propagate. You chose to vote AD and are determined to vote AD come election day. Nobody is losing your vote. Your vote goes towards making history. Towards change.

Nivvota AD. Ghax ma nibzax minnek.

Facebook Comments Box

6 replies on “Vote AD, get AD.”

Yes, you said “swiss clock” when the expression is “Swiss watch” (and taking up bad French habits on non-capitalisation, aren’t we?).

Yeah Fausto, but then again we did not have a recent scandal involving homemade Maltese watches did we?

It’s good to see more and more people directly challenging the perverse, essentially anti-democratic logic being propagated (once more) by the ‘Running Headlong Towards a One-Party-One-State’ Blog. Small, but perceptible signs which give one some real hope.

…that should have read “…challenging…the ‘Runnning Headlong Towards a One-Party State’ Blog on its home turf”

If Labour is still all so gloom and doom, than voters’ primary objective on 9th March should be to steer Malta away from such potential disaster.
The polls have consistently indicated that Labour is very likely to garner more 1st preference votes than the PN. This would imply that we are facing a PL absolute government with Joseph as PM by default, unless a 3rd party makes it to parliament, in which case there will be a possibility of a coalition of parliamentary seats and/or 1st preference votes.
If AD is elected, it is improbable that the PN would have won more seats than the PL, and it would be more likely to have a scenario of 32,32,1, or 33,31,1 or even 34,30,1 – with no extra seats allocated to the PL.
This will give an opportunity for a PN+AD coalition on the basis of parliamentary seats (32,32,1) or possibly 1st preference votes if the PL falls short of an absolute majority. One obviously cannot dismiss a PL+AD coalition, or an ultimate PL+PN grand coalition, but at least a PL absolute government would have been averted.
In this regard, anyone who genuinely believes that the PL & JM will ruin our lives may well consider giving their 1st preference to the PN (for either the top candidate or the one who is likely to garner the least votes), and then give their 2nd preference to AD.
Such strategy would maximise the PN 1st preference votes, whilst also increase the odds of AD being elected, and thus increase the possibility of averting a PL absolute government.

Comments are closed.