Categories
Mediawatch Politics

The Leap of Faith

Many are rushing to “apologise” to MP Justyne Caruana for the rash judgements they had made with regards to her potential role in the resignation of Chris Said from the post of Parliamentary Secretary. It’s an interesting development and one that requires a leap of faith. The association began yesterday when the press conference called by Chris Said in order to announce his resignation. A journalist (PBS? Times?) asked Chris Said whether the fact that Justyne Caruana was the lawyer for the person accusing him of perjury meant that this case had a political element. Chris Said replied that he would let the people decide.

Over twelve  hours passed in this day and age of internet and immediate newspaper updates before Justyne Caruana issued a clarification explaining that she was not the lawyer who presented the perjury challenge. Interesting. Or as we say on this side of the looking glass… curiouser and curiouser. Now without in any way questioning the factual side of the statement by the labour MP for the greater isle: i.e. that she was only the representative in the civil case but not in the cases alleging perjury we require a leap of faith. This leap of faith is that the civilian represented by Justyne Caruana in the civil domain of his legal battles is fully empowered with the knowledge of legal niceties related to a the laws and regulations that apply to lying under oath – or perjury.

To be more exact this client of Justyne Caruana’s would have to have had the insight, knowledge and quick wit to move for criminal proceedings di sua sponta, or of his own volition. For you see. Not only is the matter for which Chris Said is being accused infinitesimally technical – and far beyond the auspices of relevance to the ultimate outcome of the civil case – but it is also a legal conundrum visible only to the legal eye with which are endowed the most litigant and perfidious of practitioners of my not so humble trade. In other words you would have had to have been party to the civil proceedings in your lawyering capacity and to have spotted the possibility of creating a devious obstacle to the opposite lawyer concerned – full knowing that the ultimate effect of this case (for it is blatantly obvious to even the non-legal eye) will in no way impinge on the civil rights being claimed by the client concerned.

In other words. Between the moment Justyne Caruana’s client pounced on the opportunity to tackle Chris Said with a frivolous claim of perjury (we all know those facts) and the moment he got himself a lawyer to move on to the criminal stage of perjurial accusation there must have been an informed, intelligent and qualified person who must have pointd out this legal avenue afforded by Article 541 of the Criminal Code – his lawyer in the civil case for example? Are we allowed to doubt the client’s capability to do so of his own accord?

Worse still. (Ho-hum). Are we not allowed to consider the (admittedly) circumstantial fact that the perjury proceedings came within a short period of the hullaballoo in parliament when Chris Said was deemed to have slighted the pregnant Justyne by having misheard her vote? As at the time of Plategate J’accuse insists on motive and sincerely wishes that a couple of investigative journalists (preferably not of the bondi travesty kind) take up the challenge and look further into this mess. It deserves it.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Categories
Mediawatch Politics

Cultivating Ignorance

If Malta wasn’t sufficiently steeped in partisan ignorance, Inhobbkom Joseph would have to invent it. His latest intervention in the light of Chris Said’s resignation does not just defy logic but it creates a whole new universe of abject insensitivity, crass opportunism and is the political equivalent of the cheap whore that nobody would pay to sleep with. Inhobbkom Joseph may (and I say may out of whatever modicum of respect is left) have the excuse of having no inkling of the law and how it works since his studies took him far far away from the logical and the rational and into the world of lies and statistics. Having said that however he is surrounded by a bunch of people who might (again might) claim to have an idea about the workings of the law them having been proferred with the dikri (and probably their sporting such dikri on a plakka outside their offices).

Inhobbkom is appalled because Gonzi’s letter accepting Said’s resignation implies a readiness to reappoint Said as PS once this is over.  Inhobbkom “jinstab imhasseb” (is worried) that the letter does not leave the judiciary the necessary comfort zone of independence and burdens them with undue pressure. What should worry the electors is that here is a man who will soon be in a decision making position and is able to shoot such weighted bullshit out of his pen in order to gain political mileage. There is no other explanation. The facts of the alleged perjury are known to everyone and his brother (except… it seems… the Maltastar crowd who are intent on depicting Said as a criminal). Mr Leader of the Opposition (should I say Dr?) seems to be very willing to ignore these facts and prefers to murk the waters even more.

Who knows though? This might not be a mistaken attempt by inhobbkom but a concerted effort to sabotage the government’s workings. Given the weak stand of the perjury allegation and coupling that with the fact that Labour MP Justyne Caruana is the “politician/lawyer” handling the allegation on behalf of the supposed victim we would all be forgiven for being convinced that this is yet another Labour attempt to engage in the wrong form of politics. Inhobbkom might inflict damage to Chris Said’s reputation among his detractors but I am firmly convinced that Said will bounce back stronger than before.

Maltastar’s purposive selectivity is not the first we saw this week. The Times of Malta was equally damned when reporting the developments in the Nikki Dimech case. Given that it was reporting different witness statements it was somewhat worying that it chose to highlight the statement of the former contracts manager (the alleged perpetrator or victim of the bribe depending on who you believe) and failed to point out the alleged improper behaviour of a Member of Parliament. It was alleged that Robert Arrigo insisted on the contracts manager being compensated and also that the same Arrigo entered the council and shouted (intimidated) at one of the members. FUnny how the Times developed amnesia about these particular allegations which have as much weight as the allegations that it eventually chose to place in the headline.

Categories
Mediawatch

Leading by Example – Chris Said

Like a bolt out of the blue (or “out of the blues” if you speak Jose Herrera English) we have just received the news of Chris Said’s resignation from  his post of Parliamentary Secretary. I have on previous occasions, had the opportunity to praise the sterling work and promise of PS Chris Said and can only, at this point, express my full solidarity with him in what is definitely a difficult moment in his career. It is no coincidence that Dr Said has chosen to resign from his post as Parliamentary Secretary in order to better be able to defend himself in a “tranquil manner”. The accusations being brought against Said may be of a trivial nature – and we have no reason to doubt Chris Said on this matter – but the best manner to combat them is as Dr Chris Said, divested of his public persona and separate. It may be no coincidence that this is the second Gozitan within months to resign from his public post in order to better defend himself on what may be seen as  a trivial matter but still an attack on his reputation nonetheless. We sincerely wish Chris Said all the necessary success in his fight to clear his name. It is unfortunate that there may be a hint of political manipulation behind this attack – this too is PLPN politics.

Good luck Chris Said.

Categories
Mediawatch

Through the Eyes of Fanatics (Limp Biscuit)

I have been trying to get hold of the opinion columns on MaltaToday since David Friggieri told me that he made a fleeting mention to the J’accuse column on The Malta Independent on Sunday in his own MaltaToday column last Sunday. Thanks to Online Editor Matthew Vella I finally got to read through the article entitled “What makes a fanatic?”. Since, in editor Vella’s own words, the newspaper version of  MT is still on bunsen burner mode (back burner – but somehow bunsen is more appropriate) I have taken the liberty of creating a public link to the opinion column in question in order that my apologia for a “limp, imported ‘son-et-lumière’ spectacle’ is all the clearer. So before reading on click here to read David’s contribution to the MaltaToday opinion pages.

Ready? Now that you have become experts on ski-jumping allow me to add a few finer points of my own that seem to have been missed in this song and dance in praise of fanaticism. In short, without much mincing and beating (of words and round bushes), my whole argument (an apologia) rests on the fact that ski-jumping (and its injuries) only happens to the “fanatics” engaging in the sport. Firework factories and their preparation has this slightly different tendency of having a detrimental effect and of being a constant menace to other people’s life and limb (lives and limbs).

Yes. To begin with and to put our finger on the crux of the matter, firework preparation, transport and use in the Maltese islands is self-evidently a fanatic practice that puts much more than the lives of renegade desperados yearning for “the thrill of feeling alive” in manifest danger. The multiple factories dotting the islands like some insane minefield, the transportation of fireworks via main thoroughfares (metres away from civilian houses) and the questionable handling of the fireworks in situ just before the country’s air is filled with the “noise, colour and smells” are actually a continuous (and continuing threat) to the life and health of any a person who would desperately hang on to the “thrill of feeling alive” without so much bravado and manifestation of ignorant attitudes towards basic precepts of safety (thank you very much).

You see David? The ski jumper flying oh so highly and bravely over the green fields of Upper Austria is – at most – taking the risk of splattering himself onto the ground in what would be verily a gruesome affair of blood and a jigsaw puzzle of sorts for forensic experts. At most – and I underline the “at most” once again – knowing the Austrian fervour for regulation and safety (second only to the ever so boring Swiss) they would have made sure that no civilian (as against ski-jumping fanatic) wandered in the vicinity of the estimated point of landing (nor would such landing point be within range of any house or log cabin). Thusly, people who are fully capable of recognising their vital nature without resorting to fanatic thrills are spared the possibility of being surprised of a ski-jumpers limb careening through their bedroom window.

It’s not just that though is it David? You tell us:

“And let’s face it, feasts would simply not be the same without the murtali, murtaletti, blalen, murtali ta’ l-art and all the other exotic and colourful, yet potentially lethal objects which fill this country’s air with noise, colour and smells throughout the summer.”

Hmm interesting. I too am hooked to the smell of sulphur (is it sulphur?) in the air that sends unquestionable orders to the brain in the form of “tuzzana pastizzi, pizza bil-muxrums u kendi floss ‘ekk joghgbok” racing to the brain. Isn’t the pagan and spiritual thrilling eh? Does not the firework light, smell and sound provide the lovely background  to that ‘incestuous meshing of politics and religion’? Of course it does. We do not know otherwise do we? Does the fond memory of festa nights in any way justify the careless abandon with which our incestuous political leaders have tackled the issue until now? Not at all.

I’m sure an Aztec five hundred years ago would reminesce of the bygone days when the smell of blood and the scream of sacrificial victims filled the air while the population of Technotitlan celebrated the festivities in the name of the Sun God between a game of poc’t’apoc and a cup of hot choclotl. I’m sure he’d complain to the conquistador about the limp new style processions with the Virgin Mary at her helm and how they’re nothing compared to the wonderful passion exhibited by a winning poc’t’a’poc team on its way to summary execution on the high altar. Darn. These pussy Spaniards and their imported religions and traditions – they’ve ruined our passionate fanaticism to no end.

Seriously David. I’m not really that bothered about your branding a “son et lumière” as being a limp import – it is after all a question of taste and I’m not here to force feed you my questionable tastes. The problem though is that the conclusion in your article is a bit of a non sequitur. It may be cool and hip to get a thrill of feeling alive – many illegally available drugs and psychotropic substances provide just such a thrill. Does that make the danger posed by the current set up of the firework industry any better? Is fanaticism a justification? Methinks not. And while I sincerely hope that the idea of son et lumière is taken up by an avant garde village that will invest in training its sons in the art of light and sound engineering instead of bomb manufacturing I sure hope that a well-regulated single factory of fireworks will be able to still provide us with a taster of the crazy revelries of festas past.

I’m quite sure that change will not happen fast. There’s rarely hope for that on our island. In the meantime here’s an ode to the fanatics mentality – with no care in the world except their own. My way… or the highway (Limp Bizkit).

Categories
Mediawatch

Masters of the Universe (Bruges)

Helena Dalli MP penned an article in today’s Times (Politicking in Lilliput) in which she attacked PN’s councillor Cyrus Engerer for daring to insinuate that Labour’s councillors had it in for him because he is gay. Tut tut. Here at J’accuse we can see where the Labour MP is coming from and we do not need much convincing to realise that Cyrus’ is a ploy to distract from the troubles of the ill-fated Sliema Council and PN’s participation therein. What we did not appreciate were two shots by Ms Dalli MP that had absolutely nowt to do with the issue.

Firstly, in a manner most unbecoming to a member of the house of representatives (and more becoming of certain sections of the pink blogging media), Helena of Labour takes a dig at Cyrus’ name. What has Cyrus’ name got to do with the price of fish? Unless you were to detect ancient Greek vs. Persian vs Trojan undertones the dig at Cyrus’ name is completely gratuitous. Helena then moves on for the kill. Proudly parading Labour’s credentials in the pro-gay camp Helena raps Cyrus for not realising that ’twas a Labour government that decriminalised sodomy “in the 1970s, when being gay was considered a matter of shame by many and the word pufta was used liberally and meant as an insult to homosexuals and others.” Now that’s one hell of a history lesson. The angry MP goes on:

But, then, they wouldn’t teach these things in the one-year Masters degree course in political science at the College of Europe in Bruges, would they? Although they do teach students the necessary skills to research a “fact” before making claims, as opposed to relying on gut feeling.

Say what? Now I had no idea that Cyrus Engerer also attended the college I consider to be my second Alma Mater but forgive me for feeling a tad bit involved there. Since when are the achievements (?) of a Malta Labour government of the seventies in the field of sodomy an important part of the syllabus in a Masters degree course in political science? Should we really be tut-tutting all the way to the Belfroi that the lecturers in the “one-year” (sic – as against a five year Masters I guess) course failed to examine the intricate details of Labour’s massive movement for homosexual emancipation in the seventies?

Forgive me Helena but much as I may agree with you on the whole Cyrus charade and deviating tactics you really have shot yourself in the foot on this one. Labour might have come up with decriminalising sodomy in much the same manner and habit as PLPN have of legislating the obvious 50 or so years too late but Labour is also the same party whose secretary general was overheard describing a (I have to say this) “talk show host” as “Pufta” over the mic during a public meeting. That was early in the twenty first century not late in the twentieth. I doubt whether rights of homosexual persons have really been so well championed by the nouveau PL – and I sincerely doubt that any of the truck riding, violence distributing, hell raising bastards let lose in Mintoff’s era were in touch with their feminine side by the way.

As for Bruges. It really tickles me that an exponent of the progressive moderates’ agglomeration still believes in the kind of classist bullshit which il-Perit (Rhodes Scholar by the way) had gotten us used to. I am very aware that the Bruges scholarship is currently underfire in certain quarters for other reasons that are absolutely unrelated to the academic standards. I can proudly say, for one, that I got the scholarship on my own wind without any parrini or recommendations in the background. I can also proudly claim that the Bruges experience was very much like a Saint Aloysius’ sixth form abroad – once you make it in you are left to your own devices. Simple really – by handpicking a bright bunch from the start (no modesty intended – and when there are no saints pushing idiots into the system – something I cannot deny could be happening nowadays) the College of Europe needs input little else to guarantee an elevated standard. Voilà.

By misleadingly drawing the Bruges degree into your article you only succeeded in alienating your readers (at least the un-modest intelligent ones) from the main thrust of the argument. Bravo.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Categories
Mediawatch

They Don't Really Care About Us

We may fret and worry about joint Libyan and BP plans to sink an oil well off our coast (and Libya‘s) but when it comes to public acclaim about a potential disaster little or no mention is made of Malta. Surprised? Here is Andrew Johnson writing in the Independent on Sunday (IOS, UK): BP Well Threatens Ancient Libyan Sites:

Plans by the energy giant BP to sink an oil well off the Libyan coast could have disastrous consequences for the region’s rich heritage of coastal ancient city sites and shipwrecks – already under threat from oil tankers, coastal erosion and tourist developments – archaeologists from around the world have warned. […]

BP has, however, announced that it intends to go ahead with plans to sink a well – which would be 200m deeper than the one in the Gulf of Mexico – around 125 miles off the coast of Libya. Work is due to begin before the end of the year. Archaeologists fear that an oil spill in the region could destroy the area’s numerous ancient coastal and underwater sites and that thousands of historic shipwrecks could be at additional risk from drilling activity.

These include the ancient harbour town of Apollonia, in Cyrenaica – which dates from the 7th century BC and is five metres below sea level – along with two ancient cities in the region of Tripolitania, both of which are World Heritage Sites. Claude Sintes, the director of the Museum of Ancient Arles in the south of France and director of the sub-aquatic team of the French archaeological mission to Libya, said that the sites are either on the beaches or underwater close to the shore. Washed-up oil would soak the porous stone and be impossible to clean, he added.

Quick. Someone tell them about Ghar Dalam, Hal Saflieni and NET TV.

Enhanced by Zemanta