Categories
Sport

Back with the Footballing Elite

Inter-cettati fans are extatic. They are at the top European echelon and boy have they worked hard to get there. Pity that footballing spirit has little to do with the work involved. For the inter-cettati to even get a whiff of victory they had to lie low while others around them were being crucified for the ills of italian football. Their phone calls and tampering with referee lists would pass unnoticed with the connivance of the investigating officers and a very sympathetic press. They would have the main obstacles to their victories eliminated in order to win alone – much in the fashion of the playground spoilsport.

The vulture team would then live off the falsely manufactured twisted image of victim of football and nurture and develop one of the most boring teams ever to be at the pinnacle of European football.- Forget Gullit, Rijkaard and Van Basten, forger Cruyff and Di Stefano, forget Platini, Bettega and Boniek – 45 years on and they can still only produce one type of football : the catenaccio. Watching the game for my sins I could only be reminded of the hundreds of matches Juventus played against minnows who locked 10 of their players in the defending quarter of their pitch and then lobbed the ball up in counterattack. We have seen thefts of the footballing kind before – the mind harks back to the 1990 elimination of Brasil by cocainomani and co in the world cup. Milito’s role has been played by dozens of stalwarts for the minnow teams before with the only difference being that the back five in most minnow teams is not made up of potential world champs. So yes, they built a machine – might as well have built a wall of bricks – it would probably have been just as entertaining.

For this is a complaint from the corners of entertaining football. From those who will not mind being defeated if defeated means outclassed. From those who can admire a fighting Fulham as much as they can admire a creative Barcelona and a triumphant AC Milan in the 90s. It is not a complaint out of jealousy for simply one reason – there is nothing to be jealous about. You will find it hard to remember the name of the team that won the 2010 Champions’ League in the future. Most people will think a team called Mourinho won it. That says much about the personality of the team that won on the pitch. Funny. 45 years ago it was il Mago wot did it. Now it seems to be Mourinho (the press just love him – they had more cameras for him than for Inter-cettati’s motley crew last night). Willl Inter-cettati ever win a Champions League I ask? I’m not holding my breath for another 45 years to find out.

The poetry of the figures involved speaks volumes. 39% possession and 2 shots at goal. Do you see the irony behind the name “European Champions” yet? No? let me help you further. Here is the list of European champions by nationality:

Argentine: 4
Brasilian: 3
Cameroons: 1
Macedonian: 1
Romanian :1
Dutch:1

7/11 starting were non-european

Subs
Ghana: 1
Serbia: 1
Italy (and what a fine example of Italian football) : 1

1/3 was non-european

That makes it 8 out of the 14 players who went on the pitch from outside Europe. And 1 Italian of dubious footballing quality.

Which brings us to the return with the footballing elite. In economic terms the match to watch yesterday was at Wembley. The play-off for the last place in the Premier League was worth 90 million pounds sterling. Twice the worth of the Champions League final. In an exhilarating match Balckpool ousted Cardiff with the odd goal in five. Real football with real emotions still exists somewhere. Ironically the Pool also had a four decade wait to reach their goal. At least one team yesterday can proudly say that it has returned among the elite of european football.

Well done Blackpool.

Categories
Sport

Attenti al Gufo

Stasera siamo tutti con(tro di) voi. Auguri Inter-cettati…. 4 anni di lavoro dopo Farsopoli. 45 anni di attesa dall’ultimo catenaccio. Non si aspetta niente di meno questa sera…. Tanti ma tanti auguri…

Categories
Mediawatch

Selective Defence is Bondi's Plus

J’accuse has received a copy of Lou Bondi‘s defence argument before the Broadcasting Authority. It makes for very very interesting reading. Much as we would like to enter the debate on the issue of whether or not Lowell should have been allowed on the programme (and elsewhere we have done just that), we are more intrigued by the manner in which this ‘apologia’ continues to expose Lou’s selective amnesia as well as double-standards with regards to the weight of public opinion.

You will find below a link to the full document presented by Lou Bondi to the BA and you might like to read through it with particular attention to point 12 – regarding public opinion. Two questions stand out: firstly that Lou is arguing a technical point based on the very public opinion he chose to minimise in the Delimara program (Programmes People Watch).

Then there is the blatant selective amnesia – such as has been displayed before on the occasion of the infamous Plategate Bondiplus programme. Just look at point 12 of Lou’s apologia: first he quotes media guru Joe Borg and then he quotes an article in the Times – referring to the comments section. Having thus exhausted (according to Lou) all instances where his programme was mentioned and criticised he concludes:

Jidher car li ftit hafna kienu dawk li argumentaw li l-programm ma’ kellux isir. Interessanti wkoll li hafna minn dawk li qalu li l-programm kellu jsir, jikkritikaw, anki bl-ahrax, lil NL.

Brilliant. But false. Lou would like everybody to believe it. He probably believes it himself but the problem is tha this very forum chronicled the response in the mainstream media for you in the post entitled Gurnalizmu fuq Kollox (The Sunday Quotes). Claire Bonello, Mikela Spiteri and Tanja Cilia – all on the Times – and the Indy in a report all mentioned and criticised Bondiplus without any qualms.

You will notice of course that this assessment of all that Lou left out does not include the boringly irrelevant reality of the “peclieqa” on blogs… still, even without that proof you can see how selective Lou has been.

If you want a wider assessment of public opinion then dive to the wiked site youropenbook.org and input “norman lowell”. J’accuse has done it for you just click here. Scroll down to the period on and after 3rd May and see for yourself.

The farce continues….

Click to open the “Risposta BA re: Lowell” file.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Categories
Mediawatch

Sinéad – Incitement

On 3rd October 1992 Irish singer Sinéad o’Connor appeared on Saturday Night Live and gave a rendition of Bob Marley’s song “War”. During the a capella rendition she switched the word “racism” with the words “child abuse” in protest over the problems of sex abuse in the Roman Catholic Church. At the end of the performance she displayed a photo of Pope John Paul II which she proceeded to tear up while pronouncing the word “evil” and “fight the real enemy”.

Incitement? You be the judges of that.

Categories
Mediawatch

Facebook's Fine

Some guy gets fined €500 under the Press Act for having commented that the pope should be shot through the hands and feet in order to feel closer to Jesus. This declaration was made within the “confines” (that’s sarcasm guys) of a facebook group called “No to the Pope in Malta”.

The charge was of incitement under the Press Act. Some people including, surprisingly, defence lawyer Owen Bonnici, argue that the publication in question (a Facebook entry) is not made in Malta but wherever Facebook has opted to have as a place of abode. What rubbish. We have repeated time and time again that the important thing with regard to publications is not where the site is registered but where it can be read. Hence anything you write on public forums/sites/comment boards etc is liable to be subject to Maltese law for the simple reason that it can be read on a computer in Malta.

My gripe is more on the issue of “incitement” than anything else. the police must have received a complaint and proceeded thereupon – they are not so much to blame. My worry is how far do we define this incitement and with what limits. For one thing it would be evident to any reasonable minded individual that Karl Farrugia’s comment regarding the perforation of the papal limbs with projectiles is surely not in the same league of seriousness as, let’s say, a loony rightist leader’s intimation of the use of violence methods for the expulsion of immigrants.

I believe that neither in the case of Karl nor in the case of the (fictitious) loony leader are we confronted with an equivocal statement as that uttered by Henry II. History leads us to believe that speaking of Becket Henry said “Will no one rid me of this turbulent priest”. In actual fact it went more like this:

“What miserable drones and traitors have I nurtured and promoted in my household who let their lord be treated with such shameful contempt by a low-born cleric!”

Four knights – Reginald Fitzurse, Hugh de Morville, Willieam de Tracy and Richard le Breton – overheard the regent’s appeal and took him to his word. They found Becket in Canterbury cathedral and brutally murdered him. The King lived to regret this deed while the four knights ended up being excommunicated for their troubles. In any case their interpretation of the royal despair as some form of command might be forgiven. Whether we should think that Karl Farrugia’s exhortation is an invitation in the manner of Henry II is something I doubt very much.

Enrique II de Inglaterra
Image via Wikipedia

True, people should be more aware of the consequences of their utterings and postings on such tools as facebook but surely no one in his right mind would believe that Karl Farrugia’s statement was meant to be taken literally?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Categories
Mediawatch Politics

Paragon of Democracy

Lights are out or returning back on this morning in Malta. It’s long past being a funny situation – the power station business that is – and the blackout will ironically throw more fuel into the incandescent fire that is every discussion about power stations, government contracts and governmental mismanagement.

While Malta floundered around in the dark UK Deputy PM Nick Clegg was busy reassuring his voters that the forthcoming government programme will include “the “biggest shake-up of our democracy” in 178 years”. This includes fixed-term parliaments, a fully elected House of Lords and a referendum on electoral reform.

The Liberal leader is in charge of the reform plans and has stated that he wants to “transform our politics so the state has far less control over you, and you have far more control over the state”. Centralised states were on the mind of Clegg throughout his presentation and at one point he stated:

Britain was once the cradle of modern democracy. We are now, on some measures, the most centralised country in Europe, bar Malta.

Now that’s a bugger innit? The contrast being made is obvious. Britain has relinquished its past as a “cradle of modern democracy” and having done so has approached – what? – Malta. Ouch. That hurts. It’s painful. But there must be a reason why Nick’s first thought when thinking of a decentralised (and consequentially distant from being a cradle of modern democracy) country leaps to Malta.

House of Lords Chamber
Image by UK Parliament via Flickr

My bet is that if any repercussions will be had in Malta all blame will fall squarely on the nutjobs at the Alleanza Liberali who have carried the “Liberal” name for quite some time now – with dire consequences on any chances that name might have if taken up by normal minded people. There might even be a photo of Nick with John Zammit (who is currently busy working on www.freewebs.com/mintoffjani) as part of his Mintoffjan/Liberal project.

It would be too easy though to blame it on the nutjobs though. Nick Clegg, deputy PM of one of the largest political realities in Europe does not think highly of our political system – were it just a voice out of the blue it would be something we could easily ignore. Instead, Clegg is simply confirming what this forum has said for ages – the PLPN duopoly has much to answer for in this respect.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]