Change
“Because of the ruggedness of the climate and the environment, because of their pride, the people have lost the will to “do” and to change, because they feel that theirs is the perfect nation. Therefore, any attempt to change the country would be destined to fail because it would find opposition among the very same people. In any case, the Prince thought that the new government would bring nothing than a worse fate for the people.”
That is my paraphrasing of the words of the Italian author Tommasi di Lampedusa in his classic novel “Il Gattopardo”. I often return to the main themes in this book as a sort of guidelines for understanding what Malta and the Maltese want. Much to the dislike of the scoundrels and patriots of this rock, it is easy to substitute “Sicilians” with “Maltese” in the text of Tommasi di Lampedusa without losing one iota of meaning.
I occasionally chat with an acquaintance of mine about Malta and the Maltese and he likes to point out that the collective mentality of Maltese is one of constant opposition to change. The status quo is comfortable, reassuring and probably safer than the dangerous unknown of changes to come. Now I I have always felt an affinity to such concepts as change ever since the good old days when along with a few “revolutionary” colleagues of mine we set up the Liberal Reformist Society at the Saint Aloysius’ Sixth Form, much to the dismay of Fr Cilia and other well-intentioned jesuits.
The halcyon days of revolutionary fervour and clearasil dominated mornings are long gone but the affinity to change has stuck and is the cause of much frustration when I observe the goings on in the island of milk and honey. Change, it seems, is good for the slogans of the Neapolitan and Piemontese princes who alternate in the running of our kingdom – from il-Bidla tkompli (the Change Continues) to the infamous Iljuni tal-Bidla (Lions of Change) both sides of the great divide have been quick to wave the flag of progressive improvement in the guise of that simple monosyllabic battle cry of “Change” – it’s what you want.
Slowly however, as the partisan crust falls off our besotted eyelids we might gradually begin to understand that the change that is much trumpeted in popular propaganda is one that is more akin to an aside by Tancredi in “il Gattopardo”. Meanwhile, as the Prince of Salina, points out in poignant fashion – a change of government (Kings, Prime Ministers… what’s in a name) will only mean a change of accent. “Dialetto torinese invece che napoletano; e basta” – little does it matter if in our case it is a Bormla accent versus the one from Burmarrad.
Spots (Changing them)
“Tutto questo non dovrebbe poter durare; però durerà, sempre; il sempre umano, beninteso, un secolo, due secoli…; e dopo sarà diverso, ma peggiore. Noi fummo i Gattopardi, i Leoni; quelli che ci sostituiranno saranno gli sciacalletti, le iene; e tutti quanti Gattopardi, sciacalli e pecore continueremo a crederci il sale della terra.”
Il sale della terra – the salt of the earth. The untouchable elite of political power. Lampedusa borrows a biblical expression “salt of the earth” (Matthew 5:13) to describe how the rulers who retain a hold on the land (even when their quality deteriorates from that of Lions to that of Jackals) will continue to think of themselves. Salt of the earth, the bees knees – the answer to all the problems. Even when their fountain of ideas dries up and their values become tradeable items in order to retain the status quo they will be unaware of the level of decadence and the worsening of situation.
Since I kick-started the new look blog on the 10th March I have made a resolution to change the old record which interprets everything in the light of the effect of the MLPN stranglehold on Maltese politics and how it is responsible for the race to mediocrity and for the exaltation of relativism. Fair enough. It’s hard to let go of this obsessive addiction when you are very convinced that all we need to kick-start a new way of running the country is new ideas, new inputs and preferably new parties with a real spine and backbone not ones that morph according to the straw poll results. Well, the proof of the pudding is in the eating… so let’s start…
Values (adapting them)
Assuming that political parties do not calculate every step in according to its being a magnet for popularity removes the very measure with which we have viewed their actions until now. So we must begin to question again. My first question is a gamble in itself. In fact my attention was piqued by two articles in a rival weekly paper last week that appeared on the same day.
First we had an article discussing recommendations made by Parliament’s Social Affairs Committee with regard to illegal gamning arcades. Now the word “illegal” in that phrase begs some questions of its own especially since by admission of the Finance Minister the arcades are not directly violating any law but rather stand in a limbo of non-regulation. What that means is that there is no clear regulation prohibition of these arcades and in fact the Committee recommended proper regulations be drafted. In the meantime however it is a legal nonsense to suggest that the arcades are illegal until the regulations rendering them illegal is actually drafted. There are after all such principles as Legal Certainty and Legitimate Expectations.
What was commendable however was the intention behind the committee’s actions. After hearing “heart-rending accounts of people who fell prey to these addictive outlets” the committee moved a number of recommendations in order to prevent such problems from being perpetrated. The underlying message was one of the need of prevention and education so that as few Maltese as possible fall into the dangerous habit of gambling. Bravo! It seemed that a clear position in line with the general “Nanny State” syndrome that seems to be very much in vogue was in the process of being outlined here.
That impression lasted until I clicked on another article in the same issue. The headline? “World’s largest bingo hall” comes to Malta”. Bingo.com,an online gaming facility had just been granted licences from the Lotteries and Gaming Authority. Calling itself “the world’s largest bingo hall” the company boasts of 1.95 million registered members with an estimated 800 new users registering every day. The company was granted Class 1 and Class 3 licenses which allow it to operate online slot machines and pool bingo. It is one of 320 online gaming companies granted licences in Malta by the LGA.
Now beat me up with a baseball bat if I am wrong but I do detect a slight whiff of contradiction between the messages sent out by the Social Affairs Committee and the general tone of celebration whenever we attracted such valuable foreign investment from Gaming Companies. Far be it from J’accuse (us being the fence-sitters par excellence) to be on the side of the gamers or that of the despisers of one-armed bandits but independently of what I think about gambling and gambling addiction, the conflict of messages is worrying. So which value will our party in government espouse – that of protecting people from an addiction by restricting such activity or that of cheering in jubilation when a company that exposes millions of people to the pleasure of gambling decides to pay its taxes in Malta?
Well. So long as Bingo.com is precluded from offering its devilish services to the puritan Maltese all should be fine and dandy right? No way Jose! What would you say if Rebecca Gompaerts’ ship complete with portable abortion clinic were to set up base in Malta in order to save on taxes? Would it still be kosher? How long before our Bishops send the mutaween to arrest the infidel? Does your point still remain that it’s ok so long as the Maltese cannot avail themselves of the service?
Lines (Between them)
“Queste brutte cose si dicono al confessore, non si raccontano alle signorine, a tavola; per lo meno quando ci sono anch’io.” Sometimes it’s all about how and when you can say and do things. Last week we learnt that humour is not for our country. Wasn’t it Joseph Stalin who said that a happy country has no need for humour? Well, we must be very happy in Malta because even at the height of carnival – a festival of satire and merriment – humour became the cause of an arrest and a suspended jail sentence.
We are unable to read between the lines most times and it is no consolation that we are not alone. Georgia has had to pull out of the Eurovision because its song that took a potshot at Putin was not found to be funny by the organisers. In Thailand, the publisher of a popular online newspaper, Prachatai was arrested after a reader posted a comment deemed offensive to the monarchy and finally, the Iraqi journalist who threw his shoes at Dubya (and missed) was jailed for three years.
Sometimes you have to be more than an expert in reading between the lines like when Austin Gatt’s Ministry decides to address the press. Bear with J’accuse while it tries to follow the trail of reasoning in an affair bungled by both the Ministry and Damage Limitation Elves involved in “Updating” (another Newspeak euphemism) articles on the online version of the Times.
It all began with a “breaking news” on the Times site which reported that Austin “Powers” Gatt had decided to “Privatise the Road System”. Unfortunately I am not endowed with a photographic memory so I cannot remember word for word the article on the Times. What I do remember is that the content of the article prompted me to post on my blog (post called “Roadrunner”) in direct reaction to what seemed to be prima facie a ludicrous suggestion.
It took a number of updates and clarifications from the Ministry for the announcement to switch from something that seemed like a general privatisation of the road system to a convoluted legal agreement that basically means that the government is handing over into private hands that which it cannot do itself. Maybe, just maybe we might have avoided adding toll booths to the innumerable traps that seem to be laid along the road in order to drain your pockets as you commute on the only reasonable form of transport available to you till now.
Somehow the whole Times/Ministry exercise seemed to be a Newspeak collaboration of government and paper as yet another knee-jerk set of plans (uncharacteristically for Gatt) suffered the consequences of hopeless presentation. The Indy did pick up on this confusion the next day and tried to clarify the situation with Ms Amanda Ciappara – HMV at the Ministry who was originally “reluctant to give information” and only “gave in” to pressure by an obstinate journalist (I assume it was Francesca Vella – good on you!).
In the end we have vague ideas and promises to go into further detail later on. In other words it was an attempt to pepper the voters with more claptrap that had gone horribly wrong. Thank God that there was at least one set of journalists ready to question certain inconsistencies rather than wallpaper it with updates.
No Change (evidently)
“Se vogliamo che tutto rimanga com’è, bisogna che tutto cambi…” This good thing has come to an end for another week. Next week I hope to speak further about this problem of change (or lack of it) – meanwhile enjoy the polyvalent candidates for the EP election as the parties continue to try to prove that kaleidoscopic value-nets is what you really need. Who needs jackals and hyenas when we have such beautiful chameleons?
This has been J’accuse unmasking the post-carnival antics here and at http://jacquesrenezammit.com/jaccuse. You can comment with the courage of a lion or scavenge with the opportunism of a jackal…in any case you can always bet that you’re more than welcome.