Categories
Campaign 2013

That elusive middle class

I was listening to yet another radio discussion on France INFO about the Salon d’Automobile that is on in Paris at the moment. It’s actually called the “Mondial d’Auto” but nostalgics still refer to it with the original name. Listening to the experts debating the dwindling fortunes of the European auto mobile industry in these times of crisis was very revealing. One word that kept cropping up in the discussion was “la classe moyenne” (the middle class) – the main reason being that this was the social class that was most hit by the economic crisis and that risked changing its purchasing habits.

The vehicle industry turns out to be an interesting laboratory for assessment. Vehicles are either a utility or a luxury depending on how you see them but in any case, the vehicle industry needs to get a good feel of its clients and their needs if they want to keep selling new models. The first interesting observation I noted was that when clients buy a car they do not give price the highest priority. There’s a load of technical details that come before the consideration of price.

There’s that and there’s the very remarkable statement regarding the fad retro models – from VW Beetle to FIAT’s 500 to the Mini Minor to the new 2CV Citroen that is being launched at this year’s salon. According to one of the speakers the kitsch attraction of these cars allowed manufacturers to price them way above the actual cost. The 500 for example costs very little to produce and the final sale price is nowhere near the original production cost. Yet people rushed to buy these cars – and it seems that they still do.

Then there was Renault and their subsidiary Dacia. When Renault bought the Romanian company Dacia their intention was to sell these cars in Eastern Europe. The line of Dacia cars is basic and their entry price is very accessible. What Renault did not expect is for Dacia to do very well in France and Europe. Exceptionally well. Which would seem to contradict the fact that clients will not give price much consideration unless you also consider that the Dacia line seems to guarantee a sturdy reliability at a good value. All the marketing experts at Renault failed to predict the success of this car – they failed to understand what the middle class really wanted.  In the case of the Dacia the success came more of a hindsight than as an inspired marketing move.

What about the middle class then? Well the middle class is in trouble all over the place. The middle class in Europe was sold a dream that fit cleanly into a mixture of consumerism and government cushioning. The key to the growth of the middle class was linked with more spending and a constant pressure on one’s conception of “status” – what Alain de Botton famously described as Status Anxiety back in 2004. It is a bit worrying then that the classe moyenne – a preferred target of the automobile industry in times of recession – is in more than a bit of status crisis itself.

Which makes it all the more baffling that the very notion of “middle class” is being sold as something to aspire for by at least one of our political parties for the next election. Go figure.

 

Categories
Mediawatch Politics

Thrifty with Facts

Thanks to an Evarist Bartolo link on facebook I came across this article on Maltastar that compares the wages between Malta and Luxembourg taking data from a recent survey based on “average wages” and the Purchasing Power Parity. While it is interesting to look at figures consisting solely of wages as averaged out in relation to how they could be spent in the US it is obvious that a peek at the utility of that same wage in the country where it is earned would give a less skewed picture.

So while Maltastar is busy comparing Malta’s average wage of 1,808 dollars per month to Luxembourg’s whopping 4,089 dollars (top of the world) per month it would do well to look out for other stuff such as the actual cost of living in those countries.

I could not find Luxembourg or Malta on the famous Economist Big Mac Index that is based on the One Price comparison for good. I don’t frequent McD mainly because of my allergy to gluten so I would not know the prices myself. I did found this site called numbeo however that does a cool comparison thingy between states. Sure enough I confirmed what I was suspecting and here are the facts for your perusal.

Just for the sake of perspective look at the rental costs for a 1 bedroom apartment – Luxembourg average is 950€ per month while Malta is 350€. As for buying property in Luxembourg compare the 5500€ price per square metre to Malta’s 2500 €.

This is not to say that Malta’s salaries are great or that prices cannot be more competitive but rather to point out that sticking to comparing wages is deceptive and intentionally portrays a fraction of the picture. Just to give you an idea of how relative the issue is, some unions of the EU fonctionnaires based in Luxembourg have been complaining that the salaries for Luxembourg workers are equal to those based in Belgium even though the cost of living in Luxembourg is much higher.

As in the case of the gas price hike J’accuse’s point is that rather than selective charts to fuel the discontent of the voter what we really need to see is what the political parties gearing up for next election are offering on their programmes so that we may be able to assess if any part of it includes – oh hope – solutions or at least attempts at solutions.

And by the way Varist, the guys at Maltastar COULD make an effort rather than cut and paste Ruth Alexander’s article from the BBC site. Next time you decide to cut and paste you should not leave out this damning assessment on the reliability of the figures:

In truth, the economists at the ILO have had to rely on very patchy statistics. Data is missing for some countries – even a country as large as Nigeria, for example. And also, the economists at the ILO are only counting wage earners.

They exclude huge numbers of people who appear in the poverty statistics but not in the calculations for the average wage – pensioners, children and stay-at-home parents, for example, and even the self-employed.

The number of self-employed is huge. In developed countries about 90% of working people are paid employees, but that figure is lower in many developing countries. For example, in South Asia, where many people are self employed or independent farmers, just 25% of workers are salaried.

The conclusion drawn by Ruth Alexander in her article must not have made for comfortable reading at Maltastar because it defeats the very (loose) point they were trying to make. Maltastar’s selective reporting (cutting and pasting) centred on comparing Malta’s wages with the best in the world. In truth the report concludes that ” that the worldwide level of economic development is in fact still pretty low, in spite of the huge affluence that we see in some places.”

Essentially an uncomfortable truth that the economic pains that are being suffered in Malta are (unfortunately) a symptom of a “worldwide level of economic development”. Sadly for Maltastar and Varist, it’s not GonziPN who is to blame.